Forensic report review, calibrated to your jurisdiction.
Admissibility standards differ by venue — Daubert, Frye, and hybrid frameworks each shape what a defensible report looks like. ForensicShield calibrates report review to the controlling jurisdictional posture when you indicate the venue. These guides cover the federal framework and the state-specific standards for California, New York, Florida, and Texas.
One guide per jurisdiction.
Federal Forensic Psychology Evaluations
Federal forensic evaluations reviewed against FRE 702 (post-2023), Daubert practice across the circuits, and the 18 U.S.C. § 4241–4248 statutory framework.
California Forensic Psychology Evaluations
California is a hybrid admissibility jurisdiction. ForensicShield reviews CA reports against Kelly/Leahy, Sargon, Sanchez, and state-specific frameworks.
New York Forensic Psychology Evaluations
New York is a Frye jurisdiction. ForensicShield reviews NY reports against Frye/Wesley, the Parker gloss, CPL Article 730, and Article 10 SVP frameworks.
Florida Forensic Psychology Evaluations
Florida is a Daubert state. ForensicShield reviews FL reports against § 90.702, the Baker Act, Marchman Act, Jimmy Ryce Act, and custody frameworks.
Texas Forensic Psychology Evaluations
Texas applies Daubert via Robinson and Kelly. ForensicShield reviews TX reports against TRE 702, art. 46B competency, § 8.01 insanity, and Ch. 841 SVP.
Run a jurisdiction-calibrated review of your next report.
Try ForensicShield on a sample report — no upload required. Then run your own.
Run a Free Sample Analysis →14-day free trial · 2 of your own reports included, plus a free sample analysis that does not count toward your 2 · A payment method is collected for identity verification — your card will not be automatically charged when the trial ends · HIPAA compliant